IN THIS ISSUE
FRONT PAGE
FEATURE
Members or Mission - Which Comes First?
ASSOCIATE ARTICLE
Eyes Front...and Back
ASSOCIATE ARTICLE
Stakeholder Consultations
GUEST ARTICLE
Use Your Meeting to Build "Media IQ"
GUEST ARTICLE
The Essential Ethical Exam
GUEST ARTICLE
Eight Basic Expectations a Chief Executive Has of His or Her Board
GUEST ARTICLE
The Buying Cycle - Part 1
GUEST ARTICLE
Chicken or Egg: Why Are Our Professional Associations Weak?
GUEST ARTICLE
Dysfunctional Board or Council?
GUEST ARTICLE
Is Your Association Digitally Fit?
TOOLS, TIPS AND RESOURCES
PAST ISSUES
|
ASSOCIATE ARTICLE - Jane Logan
Stakeholder Consultations
Two years ago, I
was involved in a three-day multi-stakeholder
consultation that gathered veterinarians,
slaughterhouse operators, meat processors, farm
representatives, regulators, research scientists, and
animal welfare activists.
The goal was to
develop a code for the humane handling of farm animals.
I was in awe of the organizers’ risk taking. Progress
was slow, but participants got to know one another,
understand each other’s views and create some first
steps together. There were no hidden agendas and there
was a genuine desire to ensure farm animals were well
treated. I arrived thinking the organizers were wildly
ambitious and left with huge respect for transparent and
inclusive consultation. The stakes were high and so was
the long-term pay-off. It taught me to embrace the
challenges of airing diverse opinion, because common
understanding is the first step in developing
sustainable solutions.
Why consult?
Whether your
organization is working on a strategic plan, policy
development, or creating a new program, consulting with
key stakeholders is an important factor in achieving
ultimate success. Here are some benefits of reaching out
to stakeholders through surveys, one-on-one meetings and
multi-stakeholder consultations.
-
Quality input leads to quality
decision-making. A broader perspective reduces
“group think”, helps to challenge traditional
thinking, and sparks creativity in problem solving.
-
Greater
stakeholder satisfaction with the final planning
product comes from their involvement in shaping
it.
-
The
chances of successful implementation increase as
more stakeholders feel committed to the plan or
project’s goals and take ownership of the plan’s
design.
-
Good governance, transparency and
open communication are served when Boards
communicate and receive feedback from stakeholders,
instead of being guided by personal agendas.
Above all, don’t
consult with stakeholders just to say you did. If you
include them, it must be because you are willing to
include their point of view and you intend consultation
to result in change or a new direction.
What is a
stakeholder?
Stakeholders are
groups who have an interest in an organization’s work,
and to whom the organization has an ethical duty.
Association stakeholders include members, employees,
related organizations, potential partners, suppliers,
the public, regulatory bodies, and the government.
Not-for-profits and the voluntary sector may also add
clients, community groups, community leaders,
volunteers, funders and donors to this list while in the
business world, customers and owners are also included
as key stakeholders.
|
Think widely when considering who
your stakeholders may be: |
|
Board of directors |
Members |
|
Clients/customers |
Issue experts |
|
Community groups |
Potential new clients or members |
|
Community leaders |
Owners |
|
Competitors |
Partners & potential partners |
|
Employees |
Public |
|
Donors |
Regulators |
|
Funders |
Suppliers |
|
Government |
Related organizations |
|
Investors |
|
Who to consult?
Internal stakeholders
are likely to be consulted more frequently, but don’t
ignore external input. Stakeholders on the periphery of
your organization may bring important new points of view
to planning.
With good ongoing
lines of communication, it is neither practical nor
necessary to consult with all stakeholders on every
issue. Realistically, some may not be interested. Others
may have a negative attitude towards your organization
such that the difficulties of dealing with them
overshadow their potential contributions. Competitors
won’t be consulted about your strategic plan, but you
may seek their input on policy development like an
industry response to new legislation. As a rule of
thumb, the bigger the change contemplated, the more
important broad stakeholder consultation becomes.
When to consult?
Nothing beats regular
two-way communication, but focussed consultation with
stakeholders is appropriate for gathering data as a
prelude to planning and in strategy and objective
setting stages.
Three options for
stakeholder consultation
-
Surveys are a cost-efficient
way to gain input from a large number of people.
On-line surveys will even tabulate themselves these
days. Make sure you are asking the right questions to
get at the information you need, and that respondents
are representative. When the Director’s Guild surveyed
its 3,800 members, it entered every respondent in a
draw for free annual dues in their region. This
incentive ensured a large sample size and a truer
understanding of the grassroots. Surveys are a
low-risk, low-cost starting point, and are best
followed up with mechanisms for dialog, creativity and
consensus building.
-
One-on-one meetings are an
excellent way to build personal relationships while
gathering data. It’s important to set expectations
with participants on how the information will be used
and the range of other people to be consulted, so no
one is disappointed if all of their ideas are not
reflected. Above all, make sure the information
gathered is accessible to the larger decision-making
group. Interviewers sometimes return after extensive
one-on-one meetings and discover they are too far
behind in their “day jobs” to generate more than a
bare bones summary.
-
Multi-stakeholder consultations bring together
various stakeholders in a neutral forum, and are
powerful tools for sharing ideas, building consensus
and developing commitment to the end product. As the
Roman philosopher Seneca said around 2000 years ago,
the best ideas are common property. Often annual
conventions allow time for policy or strategy
development workshops. The key is to structure these
sessions so they are not a series of speeches
representing entrenched positions, but genuine
workshops. An independent facilitator will create a
comfort zone and process for constructive
contribution. Keep in mind: don’t ask people what they
think unless you’re prepared to think about and act on
what they say.
|
Table 1: Comparative benefits of
various stakeholder consultations |
|
Benefits |
Survey |
One on one
meetings |
Multi-stakeholder consultation |
|
A range of inputs is gathered |
√ |
√ |
√ |
|
Increased
stakeholder satisfaction with end result |
√ |
√ |
√ |
|
Opportunity for
real dialog |
|
√ |
√ |
|
Opportunity to
build consensus |
|
|
√ |
|
Opportunity to
build ownership in the plan and its goals |
|
√ |
√ |
|
Diverging
participants learn from one another |
|
|
√ |
|
Efficient use of
time |
√ |
|
√ |
|
Inexpensive if
travel required |
√ |
|
|
Think of
stakeholder consultation as insurance
There are four common
reasons for not consulting stakeholders at the outset of
major planning or policy development exercises:
-
You know what’s best for them and,
frankly, they don’t.
-
Their input won’t change how the
organization conducts business. There is too much
invested in current programs to change priorities, and
too few resources to add new ones.
-
You don’t want to expose divisions
of opinion through a public airing of major issues.
Dissent could get out of control.
-
You can’t afford
the time or expense.
This kind of thinking
is a severe handicap to successful planning and
sustainable implementation. It sows the seeds of
organizational obsolescence.
Stakeholder
consultation is important insurance for the long-term
effectiveness of an organization and enabling it to
build sustainable new directions. Results may be quick
or they may be slow and steady. The Canadian animal farm
welfare stakeholders are still on track and working
towards a code. They have neither bogged down in
bureaucracy like the European effort, or become too
splintered to take further common action like their
American counterparts. They are building on the
foundation laid during multi-stakeholder consultation,
where they forged a common sense of responsibility for
the end product.
Jane
Logan is AXI’s
Ottawa-based associate, and the former president of a
national trade association. She is a bilingual
facilitator and strategic planner, and heads Logan
Strategy Inc.
|
NOVEMBER
2004
|