|
|
BETTER PRACTICE
The
Governance Committee
It used to be
that the only committee involved in addressing
governance performance was the Nominating Committee.
However, the recruitment and composition of the Board is
only one small aspect of overall governance development
and performance.
While the
expectation may be that the Board should and will
address this key organizational need, typically it is a
hit-and-miss affair in most organizations.
For example,
assessment of Board performance is a critical aspect in
improving governance performance. However, in our
experience, most organizations are not undertaking any
significant and meaningful assessment of individual
directors or the Board as a whole.
As a result,
we are suggesting to clients that they establish a
Governance Committee. Some might choose to call it a
Board Development Committee, however I think that
narrows the focus a bit too much.
Some of the likely responsibilities for
a Governance Committee include:
-
an ongoing and continuous focus on
identifying, preparing and recruiting future
governance leaders, including the definition of skills
and attributes required in Board members
-
the Board election process
-
orientation of new and existing Board
members
-
training and education of the Board
related to governance roles and responsibilities (and
with respect to bridging
Board knowledge gaps)
-
assessment/evaluation of the Board,
the Chair, individual directors, including each
director's self-assessment, and Board
meetings/sessions
-
evaluation and monitoring of
governance structures and processes, including policy
development and processes for Board
monitoring/oversight of operations
-
identification and recruitment of
external resources/experts to assist the Board in its
governance role and responsibilities
-
identification and development of
recommendations on Board conflict of interest and
discipline bylaws, policies and processes
Individual organizations may find that
some of these activities are best left with the entire
Board, and also may have other governance-related
activities to be undertaken by the committee. We are
not advocating a fixed approach to how these activities
are undertaken, but only that the activities are very
important and someone needs to be clearly responsible to
make them happen.
We do not recommend that the Governance
Committee undertake these responsibilities in isolation,
but rather that the Board would be involved. The
Governance Committee takes responsibility to ensure
these activities and roles are undertaken, and may
perform preparatory and background work as required.
Wayne Amundson is president of Association Xpertise
Inc., a consulting firm serving associations and
non-profits. He is also a writer and speaker on
association and non-profit management and governance,
and is editor of The Canadian Association e-zine and
co-author of the new “Primer for Directors of
Not-for-Profit Corporations” published by the Industry
Canada and three non-profit umbrella groups in Canada.
Phone: 403-374-1822 E-mail:
admin@axi.ca Website:
www.axi.ca
|
SEPTEMBER
2004
|