IN THIS ISSUE
FRONT PAGE
FEATURE
Addressing Board Knowledge Gaps
VIEWPOINT
Getting Together
GUEST ARTICLE
Using Technology To Improve Board Performance
GUEST ARTICLE
Changing Demographics and Globalization Demand New Strategies
GUEST ARTICLE
Virtual Chapters in Associations
GUEST ARTICLE
Association Toy or Tool?
GUEST ARTICLE
Impact of PIPEDA on Charitable and Non-Profit Organizations
REGULAR COLUMNS
Change Management with Peter de Jaeger
Public Affairs with Huw Williams
Customer Relationships with Paul Ward
TOOLS, TIPS AND RESOURCES
PAST ISSUES
|
GUEST
ARTICLE - Virgil Carter
Using Technology to Improve Board
Performance
An Association Case Study
Vital Stats:
The American Society of
Mechanical Engineers (ASME) is the largest organization in
the world dedicated to promoting the art, science and
practice of mechanical engineering world wide. ASME has a
membership of approximately 120,000 in over 130
countries. Founded almost 125 years ago, the Society, and
its ASME Foundation, has a staff of over 400, with
headquarters in New York City, and regional offices in ten
other locations. Annual budgets are approximately $70M
USD, plus $17M USD for the Foundation. ASME is one of the
leading worldwide standards development organizations (SDO),
in the area of technical codes and standards. ASME is
governed by a Board of Governors of thirteen individuals,
who meet in regularly scheduled business meetings four
times a year, and once in an annual strategic planning
retreat.
The Challenges:
There were several
interrelated challenges:
-
How to free the Board of Governors
from spending inordinate amounts of time on routine
reports and operational issues, at the expense of key
strategic priorities?
-
How to eliminate paper filled
three-inch thick, three-ring agenda binders, numerous
last-minute addenda, and begin implementation of a new
paperless, electronic agenda for business meetings?
-
How to make Board of Governors
meetings more productive, enriching and fulfilling?
The Solutions:
A time analysis was
conducted of the agendas of the Board of Governors for
2001. It clearly showed that substantial Board meeting
time was being spent on routine reports and other
non-strategic issues. Little time had been made available
for significant strategic issues—their identification,
discussion and decision-making. At one of the four
meetings for 2001, for example, not a single minute had
been scheduled for strategic issues! This meeting,
representing 25% of the time available for Board business
meetings, was fully occupied with routine reports and
other non-strategic issues.
The Board agreed that
the “highest and best value” of a governing body was as a
strategic body, focusing on strategic priorities for the
Society. The Board took the position that their proper
role was the exploration, deliberation, and
decision-making for key strategic issues, together with
monitoring of operations designed to execute approved
strategy.
As a result, the Board
unanimously agreed to consider reorganization of their
agenda, as an annual calendar, and using a standard
template approach, commencing November 2002. They agreed
to the use of an electronic format, incorporating a
consent calendar, which would include all reports and
other routine matters (unless “pulled” for discussion
during contingency time), with the goal to maximize “air
time” for exploration of key strategic issues, and
subsequent deliberation and action.
New Standard Agenda
Template:
A new standard agenda
template was developed to simplify organization of
contents, the handling of reports and routine matters, and
to maximize critical exploration of and action on
important strategic issues.
Electronic Agenda:
The standard agenda
template was developed into a completely electronic model,
including all supporting materials. All paper-based
agenda and materials, together with related collating and
distribution logistics, were eliminated.
The Process:
Standard Agenda
Template:
ASME built upon
recommendations advanced by respected association
consultant Glenn Tecker,
Tecker Associates, and transitioned to an agenda
template consisting of:
-
Welcome, Announcements & Formal
Adoption of the Agenda
-
Consent Calendar—Routine Items for
Receipt
-
Consent Calendar—Routine Items for
Action
-
Move to “as if in committee of the
whole”
-
Discussion Items
-
Return to Formal Session
-
Action Items
-
Contingency Time
-
Adjournment
Electronic Agenda:
The web site for ASME
Board of Governors was expanded to include a specific page
for agendas and minutes. The URL for the new page is:
http://www.asme.org/bog/minutes.html
The web page for
agendas and minutes is an unsecured link, but specific
confidential or proprietary agenda items are password
protected. This approach has the advantage of general
access and transparency concerning the Board’s agendas,
supporting materials and minutes, while allowing
protection of specific materials where appropriate.
Since introduction,
continual meeting-by-meeting improvements have resulted in
an electronic agenda model currently composed as follows:
-
Agendas and all meeting materials are
hosted on ASME Board web site
-
Agenda contents are dynamic, with
meeting materials continuously added until cut-off date,
generally 10-14 days prior to the meeting
-
At their choice, Governors may
download agenda and files to the hard drive of their
portable computer for use at business meetings, burn
them to a personal CD-ROM, or print off their own
materials to individually bring to the meeting
-
A CD-ROM of the full agenda and all
materials is prepared by ASME and available to all
Governors at the meeting site, for use in Governor’s
portable computers
-
A limited number of fully printed
agendas and all materials are available for Governors at
the meeting site for those that prefer this media onsite
-
No printed materials are
pre-assembled for or pre-mailed to Governors
Unintended
Consequences:
After initial
introduction of the electronic agenda, some Governors
expressed negative reactions to the time that it took to
download agendas and files to their computers or
printers. The issue was traced to low bandwidth
connections by some individual Governors. Those with high
speed DSL or cable connections to the Internet have not
experienced negative delays.
A few service
providers, notably AOL, makes it difficult to receive
email with large attachments, thus making it difficult to
establish an alternative transmission method for files
located on the Board’s website. High speed access to the
ASME Board website for direct file access proved to be the
most reliable solution.
Measurements &
Results:
Governors have assessed
the electronic approach as a highly successful project.
The Governors appear to appreciate and use the options for
access to agendas and supporting materials. The model
continues to be refined, based on assessment comments
after each meeting. There have been no requests to return
to three-inch, three-ring binders.
Lessons Learned:
Approximately 60% of
the current Board bring their portable computers to
meetings (not all current Governors have portable
computers, and/or not all apparently feel comfortable
using electronic documents and files at meetings).
Since two of the four
annual meetings (plus the annual retreat) are located at
hotel locations that differ, year to year, the required
technology, plus connection costs for live,
Internet-hosted agenda connections for the Board of
Governors, plus supporting staff and visitors, have not
yet proven to be economical and reliable. Live,
Internet-hosted agendas, and live access to materials, may
be more cost-effective for a group the size of the ASME
Board for the meetings held twice each year at ASME
headquarters, where live connection logistics may be
accomplished more economically and reliably. Either LAN
or Wi-Fi systems may prove to be viable in the future.
This presumes that 100% of those participating will be
computer literate, equipped and comfortable, which has not
yet proven to be the case.
New York corporation
law, where ASME is incorporated, does not yet allow for
full, off-site distributed electronic meetings and voting,
as is currently the case in some other U.S. states and
perhaps Canadian provinces. Nevertheless, the Board of
Governors is considering future scheduling of at least one
meeting a year using an asynchronous
teleconference/Internet-hosted meeting, supported by
Raindance, Web-X or similar service provider. At present,
in order to comply with New York law, any action items at
such an electronic meeting will have to be formally
reconfirmed, using the consent calendar, at the next
onsite meeting of the Board.
The success of the new
agenda model is predicated on key principles, which have
been demonstrated to work effectively for the ASME Board.
These include:
-
“Air-time”, the greatest asset of a
governing body, should be protected for important
discussion and action items. Accordingly, reports are
to be written, strictly limited to consent calendar, and
receive no airtime, unless a Governor has a specific
request to “pull” the report from the consent calendar
for further explanation during contingency time.
Governors are expected to have read reports and be
familiar with them prior to the meeting.
-
Reports, and other items of routine
nature, are segregated into “receipt” and “action”
categories of the consent calendar. The consent
calendar is acknowledged (items for receipt) or approved
(items for action) en masse, subject to a request by a
Governor for a specific item to be pulled. Such items
are marked for contingency time, if available, or
scheduled for the next meeting, if contingency time is
unavailable.
-
Moving to “as if in committee of the
whole” allows the Board to discuss and explore key
agenda items as Governors see fit, without the pressure
of recorded minutes, and without the limitations imposed
by introduction of specific motions whose parliamentary
requirements limit discussion to the motion on the
floor. Equally important, separating discussion from
action allows Governors to focus on “exploration” of the
issue, through preliminary discussion with their
colleagues. Separating discussion from action also
allows Governors to avoid the predictable effort to
convince others to a particular point of view which, in
turn, results when a formal motion is introduced, and
when subsequent comments are limited to “for or against”
the motion.
-
Initial discussion, separated from
any proposed action, often encourages the widest range
of early Board exploration and commentary. It often
yields some of the richest Board experiences for
individual Governors and for the Board, working as a
whole.
-
At the close of discussion of the
discussion portion of the agenda, after all items
scheduled for either discussion and/or subsequent action
have been explored, formal session resumes, the action
part of the agenda commences, and standard parliamentary
processes are used to introduce, deliberate and act on
formal motions.
-
The time spent in action items is
remarkably brief and focused, when sufficient initial
time has been previously spent in exploratory
discussion.
What's
next for ASME?
Good question.
We are very much involved in organizational and
strategic change to become a more nimble, agile and more
valuable global organization, providing greater
leadership and benefits to our 120,000 members in over
130 countries. Our vision includes continuing growth to
400,000 members worldwide. Moving to electronic
agendas, and virtual knowledge and community
relationships with members, customers and sister
societies throughout the world seems essential to our
vision. I'd love to hear about your related
experiences.

Virgil
R. Carter is the executive
director of
ASME International
(American Society of
Mechanical Engineers), a
New York City-based global
organization with 125,000
members around the world.
Virgil can be contacted at
carterv@asme.org.
|
JANUARY 2004
OUR MISSION
To build better
associations and non-profits by
delivering unique
and unparalleled expertise, programs
and services
to their staff and
volunteers.
|